ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2025
Use of Technology in the Rehabilitation Setting: Therapy Observations, Mixed Methods Analysis, and Data Visualization.
Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synergy-based Functional Electrical Stimulation for gait rehabilitation in chronic stroke: a pilot study.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Trial
- Robotic Technologies for Hand Recovery After Stroke: A Reflection on Research Paths in Honor of Dr. Steven Wolf.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2026Article
- Towards routine biomechanical data collection in stroke rehabilitation: a usability comparison of IMU and markerless motion capture systems for functional upper-limb assessments.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- FDA-Listed Interactive Devices for Home Movement Rehabilitation After Stroke: A Mixed-Methods Study of Availability, User Needs, Information Gaps, and an Accompanying Dataset.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To analyze real-world rehabilitation technology (RT) use, with a view toward enhancing RT development and adoption. Design: A convergent, mixed-methods study using therapy observations, semistructured templates, and summative content analysis. Setting: Ten neurorehabilitation units in a single health system. Participants: Three research clinicians (1 occupational therapist [OT], 2 physical therapists [PTs]) observed approximately 78 OTs and 100 PTs (N=178). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Characteristics of RT, time spent setting up and using RT, and clinician behaviors. Results: Ninety distinct devices across 15 different focus areas were inventoried. Three hundred twenty-nine RT uses were documented over 44 hours, with only 42% of inventoried devices observed used. RT was used more during interventions (72%) than measurement (28%). Intervention devices used frequently were associated with balance/gait (39%), strength/endurance (30%), and transfer/mobility training (16%). Measurement devices were frequently used to measure vital signs (83%), followed by grip strength (7%), and upper extremity function (5%). Device characteristics were predominately electrically powered (56%), actuated (57%), monitor-less (53%), multiuse (68%), and required little familiarization (57%). Setup times were brief (mean ± SD = 3.8±4.2 and 0.8±1.3min for intervention and measurement, respectively); more time was spent with intervention RT (25.6±15min) than measurement RT (7.3±11.2min). RT nearly always involved verbal instructions (72%) with clinicians providing more feedback on performance (59.7%) than on results (30%) to their patients. Clinicians were evenly divided between providing one-on-one direct attention (49.7%) and multitasking (50.3%), such as completing documentation, when using RT with patients. Conclusions: Even in a tech-friendly hospital, most available RTs were observed unused, especially measurement technologies. We discuss how the identified characteristics of used RT, as well as the observations about how therapists used RT, may be useful in guiding new designs. An interactive data visualization page supplement is also provided to facilitate further exploration with this dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.