ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Predictive modeling of eye lens dose in interventional radiology: a polynomial regression approach to cumulative fluoroscopy dose.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between cumulative fluoroscopy dose and eye lens radiation dose among interventional radiologists, and to develop a predictive model to enhance occupational radiation safety. Methods: We collected data from interventional radiologists, focusing on cumulative fluoroscopy dose during procedures and corresponding eye lens doses. A quadratic polynomial regression model was developed to assess the non-linear relationship between cumulative fluoroscopy dose and eye lens dose. The study involved the use of machine-generated cumulative dose data and personal eye lens dosimeters. Results: The quadratic polynomial regression model effectively captured the non-linear relationship for cumulative doses >20 Gy, enabling precise dose prediction at higher exposure levels where cataract risks escalate. However, the model showed limited accuracy for doses ≤ 20 Gy. This model allowed for more precise prediction of eye lens dose, particularly at higher exposure levels where the risks of radiation-induced cataracts increase significantly. Conclusions: The quadratic polynomial regression model serves as a potentially valuable tool for real-time monitoring in high-exposure scenarios (>20 Gy), supporting radiation safety protocols in clinical practice. Integration into routine hospital systems may enhance radiation protection protocols and inform policy development, aligning occupational dose monitoring practices with international safety standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.