Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40463726›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Socioecological correlates of perceived cooking skills among Spanish adolescents: the EHDLA study.

Carlos Hermosa-Bosano, José Francisco López-Gil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carlos Hermosa-BosanoWell-being, Health and Society Research Group, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito, Ecuador.
José Francisco López-GilDepartment of Communication and Education, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Seville, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Individuals' perceptions of their cooking skills have been associated with healthier eating patterns. This study examines the socioecological factors associated with adolescents' cooking skills perceptions within a Spanish context. Key factors analyzed included sex, age, immigrant status, socioeconomic status, parental education, family structure, household size, schooling type, and area of residence. Methods: This research used data from adolescents aged 12-17 who took part of the Eating Healthy and Daily Life Activities (EHDLA) study (Region of Murcia, Spain). A chi-squared test and generalized linear models with binomial distribution were used to examine associations. Results: Perceptions of cooking skills varied among adolescents; 16.3% rated their cooking skills as very adequate. Perceived cooking skills were significantly associated with sex, socioeconomic status (SES), and type of schooling. Female adolescents had over twice the odds of perceiving their cooking skills as very adequate compared to males [odds ratio (OR) = 2.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.40-3.03, Conclusions: The findings from this study suggest the importance of attending the needs of specific groups such as male adolescents, those from lower SES backgrounds and those in publicly funded private schools. In addition, our results suggest the need to question the gender norms traditionally associated to cooking. Our results can help design interventions that enhance cooking skills among adolescents. These interventions can foster healthier eating habits and ultimately reduce diet-related conditions in adolescence and later in adulthood.

Indexed as

CookingAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleSex FactorsSocial ClassSocioeconomic FactorsSpainSurveys and Questionnairescookingcooking skillsculinary competencefood agencyfood literacy

Identifiers

PMID40463726
PMCPMC12130023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.