ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Social vulnerability and cancer risk from air toxins in Louisiana: a spatial analysis of environmental health disparities.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling the impact of environmental and socioeconomic factors on health expenditure in Türkiye.iScience · 2026Article
- Identification of Spatiotemporal Associations of Social Determinants of Health on the Incidence of Adverse Birth Outcomes in Louisiana.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Advancing Environmental Justice through Chemical Education: Perspective from New Orleans' Water and Air Quality Challenges.Journal of chemical education · 2026Article
- Assessing Social Determinants of Health in Transplantation and CAR-T Recipients: Expert Panel Recommendations from the Survivorship Special Interest Group of ASTCT.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Louisiana faces significant environmental health challenges due to elevated air toxicity near industrial sites. The state hosts over 300 manufacturing facilities, more than 150 petrochemical plants, and 15 refineries, which, although economically beneficial, pose significant health risks to surrounding communities. Exposure to industrial emissions has been linked to respiratory conditions such as asthma, reproductive disorders, kidney damage, and various cancers. An 85-mile stretch along the Mississippi River, commonly referred to as "Cancer Alley," has long been associated with elevated cancer rates, particularly among communities with high social vulnerability. Methods: This study examines the relationship between social vulnerability, cancer incidence, and cancer risk using publicly available datasets, including air toxics data from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and cancer incidence rates from the Louisiana Tumor Registry (LTR). Linear regression, interaction analyses, and geographically weighted regression were applied to assess how environmental and socioeconomic factors jointly influence cancer risk. Results: Results reveal that cancer incidence was associated with elevated air toxins and compounded by social factors such as minority status, low income, and single-parent households. Notably, some regions exhibited a counterintuitive negative association between air toxins and cancer incidence, which may be due to data limitations, including the use of older air quality data, latency in cancer development, or underreporting. Discussion: These findings underscore the importance of strengthening environmental regulations, real-time air quality monitoring, and community-based public health initiatives to reduce cancer disparities and support affected communities in Louisiana.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.