ArticleProgress in rehabilitation medicine2025
Effect of Home-based Trunk Training on Reactive Stepping in Individuals with Chronic Stroke: A Single-subject Experimental Study with Two Cases.
Article in Progress in rehabilitation medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Reactive stepping is necessary to prevent falls when a person slips or trips while walking, particularly in outdoor activities. Individuals with stroke usually exhibit reactive balance impairment. Trunk training is effective for improving balance and mobility after stroke; however, its effect on reactive stepping remains unknown. This study aimed to examine the effects of trunk training on reactive stepping in community-dwelling individuals after stroke. Methods: This study was conducted using an A-B-A single-subject design. Two community-dwelling women with chronic stroke (79 years old, 9 years post-stroke and 83 years old, 17 years post-stroke) participated in this study. The baseline (A) and intervention (B) phases lasted for 6 weeks. Specifically, the participants did not receive any intervention in phase A, whereas they performed home-based trunk training in phase B. Outcome measures included the foot-off time, maximum trunk rotation angular velocity, number of steps during forward reactive stepping following perturbation, and Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) score. Results: Decreased trunk rotation and step count corresponding to improved TIS score were observed in one case after the intervention. However, trunk control did not improve in the other case after the intervention, and reactive stepping kinematics remained unchanged. Conclusions: Enhancing trunk control may improve reactive stepping in individuals with chronic stroke; nevertheless, further evidence is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.