ArticleArXiv2025
Detection of moving objects using self-motion constraints on optic flow.
Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As we move through the world, the pattern of light projected on our eyes is complex and dynamic, yet we are still able to distinguish between moving and stationary objects. We propose that humans accomplish this by exploiting constraints that self-motion imposes on retinal velocities. When an eye translates and rotates in a stationary 3D scene, the velocity at each retinal location is constrained to a line segment in the 2D space of retinal velocities. The slope and intercept of this segment is determined by the eye's translation and rotation, and the position along the segment is determined by local scene depth. Since all possible velocities arising from a stationary scene must lie on this segment, velocities that are not must correspond to objects moving within the scene. We hypothesize that humans make use of these constraints by using deviations of local velocity from these constraint lines to detect moving objects. To test this, we used a virtual reality headset to present rich wide-field stimuli, simulating the visual experience of translating forward in several virtual environments with varied precision of depth information. Participants had to determine if a cued object moved relative to the scene. Consistent with the hypothesis, we found that performance depended on the deviation of the object velocity from the constraint segment, rather than a difference between retinal velocities of the object and its local surround. We also found that the endpoints of the constraint segment reflected the precision of depth information available in the different virtual environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40463695PMC12133078What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.