ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2025
Multidisciplinary and home-based management in neonatal unilateral foot drop: a case report.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Foot drop in newborns is a rare condition with limited cases reported in the literature. It can result from various aetiologies including neurological, muscular, anatomical, or mechanical factors. Diagnosis can be challenging as identifying the underlying cause is essential for determining the appropriate course of management. Case presentation: We present the case of a newborn with unilateral foot drop highlighting the diagnostic approach and clinical progression. Clinical evaluation and instrumental examinations, including electromyography and nerve conduction studies, showed isolated external popliteal of the sciatic nerve dysfunction. There were no associated spinal cord or musculoskeletal abnormalities. A prolonged and complicated delivery, with sustained intrauterine limb malposition and nerve compression, was identified as the likely cause, leading to transient ischemia and peripheral nerve impairment. Despite the initial weakness and inability to dorsiflex the foot, no surgical or pharmacological intervention was required. Supportive care and close clinical monitoring were adopted besides the active involvement of parents in foot positioning and mobilization. Over the following months, gradual neurological recovery was observed, culminating in the complete resolution of symptoms by the fifth month of life. Conclusion: This case underscores the importance of recognizing transient peroneal nerve palsy as a potential cause of neonatal foot drop. It also highlights the role of conservative management and expectant observation in cases where spontaneous recovery is likely, avoiding unnecessary interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.