Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40463680›Full record

ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2025

Salivary analysis in adults with and without root caries in South coastal population of India - A cross-sectional analytical study.

Jyothi Shetty, Mithra N Hegde, N Suchetha Kumari, Neevan D'Souza, Shilpa S Shetty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jyothi ShettyDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, A B Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Mithra N HegdeDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, A B Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
N Suchetha KumariDepartment of Biochemistry, K S Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Neevan D'SouzaDepartment of Biostatistics, K S Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Shilpa S ShettyCentral Research Laboratory, K S Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to assess the salivary flow rate, pH, buffering capacity, and glycoproteins levels in root caries-active and root caries (RC)-free subjects. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Outpatient Department of A B Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences with a sample size of 94 subjects. After screening of the subjects, the salivary samples were collected from 47 RC-active and 47 RC-free subjects for analysis. The following parameters were assessed - salivary flow rate, pH, buffer capacity, levels of salivary amylase, mucin, albumin, globulin, and total salivary protein. Results: Age was significantly higher in the RC group compared to the non-RC group ( Conclusion: The study demonstrated reduced salivary flow and buffer capacity, along with lower albumin levels and higher mucin-1 concentrations in individuals with RC. The salivary analysis provides a noninvasive and effective approach to assess RC risk. Incorporating salivary diagnostics into routine dental check-ups, particularly for older patients, can help in tailoring preventive care and treatment plans.

Indexed as

Buffer capacityflow rateroot cariessalivary analysissalivary proteins

Identifiers

PMID40463680
PMCPMC12129288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.