ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2025
Assessment of anatomical contacts and contours of class II restorations using four different dental matrix systems: An
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: The assessment of reestablishment of correct anatomic contour and proximal tightness with minimal gingival overhang of a class II restoration. Aim: This Materials and Method: Standardized class II mesio-occlusal conservative cavities were prepared on two hundred typodont teeth and assigned into four groups ( Statistical Analysis Used: Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test of significance and Mann-Whiteny Results: The restorations showed statistically significant difference, with Walser matrix system and U Band demonstrating minimal overhang. No significant difference was observed for contact tightness among the groups ( Conclusions: The sectional precontoured matrix system Palodent V3 system recreated the best proximal contour and contact anatomy, while minimal overhang was generated by the Walser matrix.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.