ArticleFood chemistry: X2025
Physically modification treatments improved high internal phase emulsions stabilized by walnut protein.
Article in Food chemistry: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- High-foaming modified walnut protein enhances milk coffee quality and volatile aroma profile.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Walnut protein (WP)-based emulsions are notable for their sustainability and biocompatibility. However, their emulsifying capability is often hindered by a densely packed structure. This study investigates the impact of physical modifications, specifically high-speed shearing, heat treatment, and ultrasonic treatment, on the structure of WP and examines the subsequent effects on the physicochemical properties and stability of the resulting high internal phase emulsions (HIPEs). The three modification methods reduced the average WP particle diameter by 55.38 %, 48.31 %, and 73.66 %, respectively, the corresponding D
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.