ArticleACS catalysis2025
Unveiling the Catalytic Mechanism and Conformational Dynamics of Guinea Pig l‑Asparaginase Type 1 for Leukemia Drug Design.
Article in ACS catalysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ETV4 Promotes Colorectal Cancer Progression by Reprogramming Asparagine Metabolism to Remodel the Stromal Microenvironment.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we present a computational analysis of the catalytic properties of guinea pig asparaginase type 1 (or gpASNase1), an enzyme of mammalian origin that offers a potential alternative for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. This enzyme transforms asparagine into aspartate, depriving leukemia cells of this essential amino acid. A combination of molecular dynamics simulations, free energy calculations, and mechanistic insights based on quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics hybrid approaches was used to identify those residues contributing to the catalytic cycle of the enzyme. We dissected the contribution of enzymatic residues to substrate binding and selectivity, showing why this ASNase can degrade asparagine but not glutamine. We also studied the conformational dynamics of the enzymatic loop closing the active site, demonstrating that the substrate binding favors the closed state. The catalytic reaction mechanisms, composed of two stages, acylation and hydrolysis, were explored as well. The rate-limiting step presents a free energy barrier close to the experimental estimation and corresponds to the nucleophilic attack of enzymatic Thr19 on the carbonyl carbon atom of the substrate. Analysis of the electric field created by the protein sheds light on the role of certain residues and structural motifs in stabilizing the reaction transition state. The conclusions of this analysis are useful for rationalizing the properties of chimeras derived from gpASNase1 and predicting additional residue positions, where mutations could enhance substrate binding and loop dynamics. The results of this study enhance the understanding of gpASNase1, offering valuable insights into rational mutations and enzyme engineering for the treatment of leukemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.