ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)
Digital biomarkers: Redefining clinical outcomes and the concept of meaningful change.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Digital Biomarkers for Early Detection and Monitoring of Neurological Disorders: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- AI-enabled digital phenotyping for Alzheimer's disease: a review of multimodal sensor integration and symptom trajectories.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2026Review
- Digital biomarkers for brain health: passive and continuous assessment from wearable sensors.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- A real-world feasibility study: at home longitudinal use of the Cumulus NeuLogiq® platform for electrophysiological and neurocognitive measures in patients with mild Alzheimer's Disease dementia.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- AI-Based Severity Classification of Dementia Using Gait Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Global research landscape, hotspots, and emerging trends of digital biomarkers: A bibliometric analysis.Digital healthArticle
- A scalable workflow using digital cognitive assessment and pTau217 for MCI detection.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
- Digital biomarkers: Redefining clinical outcomes and the concept of meaningful change.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MCID (minimal clinically important difference) is a patient-centered concept used in clinical research that represents the smallest change that someone living with Alzheimer's disease would identify as important. There are several challenges associated with the universal application of this construct. Alzheimer's disease progresses differently for each individual, complicating the establishment of a universal standard that accounts for individual-level issues. Alzheimer's disease is also a gradual and evolving disorder, and what is perceived as clinically meaningful can vary significantly at early and late disease stages. People living with Alzheimer's disease and caregivers may have differing perspectives on the benefits of treatment outcomes, making it more challenging to establish an appropriate MCID. Moreover, Alzheimer's trials rely on a variety of tests to evaluate cognitive and functional impairments. However, these tests often lack sensitivity to early-stage changes and are affected by variability in rater rankings. Digital biomarkers and advanced health technologies have emerged as a hot topic in modern medicine. They offer a promising approach for detecting real-time, objective clinical differences and improving patient outcomes by enabling continuous monitoring, individualized assessments, and leveraging artificial intelligence learning for complex analytical predictions. However, while these advancements hold great potential, they also raise important considerations around standardization, accuracy, and integration into current clinical frameworks. As new technologies are introduced alongside evolving regulatory frameworks, the primary focus must remain on outcomes that truly matter to people living with Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers, ensuring that the principle of clinical meaningfulness is not lost. Highlights: Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) represents the smallest change in a patient's condition that would be considered meaningful, but defining this for Alzheimer's disease is challenging due to its heterogeneity.The perception of what is clinically meaningful may differ at the individual level, at different disease stages within the same individual, and between patient and caregiver.Traditional tests used as endpoints in Alzheimer's trials lack the sensitivity to detect subtle changes and are limited by range restrictions, making them less effective for accurately capturing treatment efficacy.Digital biomarkers and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven health technologies may offer the potential to enhance the detection of clinically meaningful changes by providing continuous, objective monitoring and advanced analytics for individualized patient assessments.Both the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) are playing pivotal roles in advancing the use of digital health technologies, facilitating the evolution of regulatory frameworks to ensure these innovations are effectively integrated into clinical research and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.