ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India
Process improvement in automated blood cultures: Our road to better patient care.
Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Blood cultures (BC) are a complex multistep process susceptible to errors at multiple levels. Our study was conducted to monitor the compliance to standard operating procedures, design an intervention plan for improvement and monitor the impact of the intervention. The study design focuses on the intervention. Methods: A hospital-based prospective interventional study was carried out, monitoring various pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical factors in two phases. Our interventions focused on communication and training for the deficiencies noted in completeness of test request form, contamination rates, and sample loading interval. Results: Comparison between both phases showed a statistically significant improvement (p < 0.05, Chi square test) following our interventions in the completeness of test request form, contamination rates and sample loading interval. There was an improvement in the intimation of critical Gram stain from positive flagged bottles, which was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Our study highlights how educational interventions can influence quality of BC. Continuous monitoring and interventions are key for quality improvement in BC processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.