Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40463611›Full record

ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India

Trials and tribulations: Developing an artificial intelligence for screening malaria parasite from peripheral blood smears.

Shilpi Saxena, Parikshit Sanyal, Mukul Bajpai, Rajat Prakash, Shiv Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Infectious disease challenges in the post-COVID era.Medical journal, Armed Forces India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shilpi SaxenaClassified Specialist (Pathology) & Trained in Hematopathology, Command Hospital (Western Command), Chandimandir, India.
Parikshit SanyalClassified Specialist (Pathology) & Trained in Transplant Immunology, Command Hospital (Western Command), Chandimandir, India.
Mukul BajpaiClassified Specialist (Pathology & Microbiology), Command Hospital (Western Command), Chandimandir, India.
Rajat PrakashCommandant, Command Hospital (Western Command), Chandimandir, India.
Shiv KumarGraded Specialist (Pathology), Command Hospital (Western Command), Chandimandir, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Detection of malaria parasite from blood smears remains the gold standard for confirmation of diagnosis. Screening blood smears for malaria parasite has a sensitivity of 75 %, and requires intensive training of the laboratory technician. In the present study, we have attempted to develop an artificial intelligence to automate the process of malaria parasite detection. Methods: We acquired 352 images of Leishman-Giemsa-stained peripheral blood smears, containing either normal red blood cells (RBCs) or parasitised RBCs. With a trial and error approach, we developed five deep learning models: (A) Naive deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) for trophozoites, (B) Modified Inception V3 pretrained neural network (C) Combination of model A and B, (D) Segmentation of cells from the images through Watershed Transform and naive tri-class DCNN (normal RBCs, parasitised RBCs, WBC/platelets), and (E) A naive DCNN model to detect ring forms. The images were randomly split into training and test sets and training was imparted on all the models. After completion of training, performance of each model was assessed on the test set. Results: Overall, the best combination of sensitivity and specificity was seen in model D (85 % and 94 %, respectively) in detecting parasites; in addition to trophozoites, model D could also detect ring forms. The performance of model A, B & C suffered from lack of either sensitivity or specificity. Conclusion: The present study represents the first step towards development of a complete module for screening malaria parasites from automated microphotography/whole slide images.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceBlood smearMachine learningMalariaNeural network

Identifiers

PMID40463611
PMCPMC12127489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.