Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40463595›Full record

ArticleNature and science of sleep2025

Bed Partners' Perspectives and Sleep Quality After Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Christopher Seifen, Katharina Ludwig, Christian Ruckes, Christoph Matthias, Haralampos Gouveris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christopher Seifen *Sleep Medicine and Neurostimulation Center & Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2356-7494
Katharina Ludwig *Sleep Medicine and Neurostimulation Center & Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6462-3763
Christian RuckesInterdisciplinary Center for Clinical Trials (IZKS), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4823-0430
Christoph MatthiasSleep Medicine and Neurostimulation Center & Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Haralampos GouverisSleep Medicine and Neurostimulation Center & Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7299-7346

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) is a treatment option for patients with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and intolerance or non-acceptance of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy. Improvements in respiratory outcomes, sleepiness and quality of life have been demonstrated in treated patients. We aimed at evaluating the bed partner's perspective on HGNS therapy. Methods: In a cross-sectional exploratory prospective study (Clinical Trial Registration: DRKS00030554), 33 consecutive bed partners of patients treated with a unilateral, respiratory-coupled HGNS device in a tertiary medical center completed a 23-item custom-made questionnaire with questions that addressed the bed partner's perceptions and their satisfaction with HGNS therapy. Results: Bed partners reported that the patients were more comfortable with HGNS therapy (97.0%) compared to PAP therapy, their own sleep quality was better (90.9%) and their sexual partnership was equivalent in 69.0% and better in 27.3%. Their partners' snoring was reported as reduced in 87.9%. This trend was especially reported by bed partners of therapy responders. Bed partners did not need to motivate the patients to use HGNS therapy (81.8%), were satisfied with their partners' HGNS therapy (78.9%) and would recommend HGNS therapy to others (81.8%). Response to HGNS treatment or sex did not influence the reported outcomes. Conclusion: Bed partners of HGNS-implanted OSA patients perceive the HGNS therapy mostly positive and are very often satisfied with this therapy. Nonetheless, single aspects of HGNS therapy for OSA may be experienced differently by the patients' bed partners.

Indexed as

bed partnerhypoglossal nerveneurostimulationquestionnairesleep apnea

Identifiers

PMID40463595
PMCPMC12130171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.