Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40463591›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025

An investigation into possible interactions in the vestibular system and the cochlea during electrical stimulation.

David Lanthaler, Andreas Griessner, Viktor Steixner, Julie Corre, Maurizio Ranieri, Samuel Cavuscens, Gautier Grouvel, Nils Guinand, Clemens M Zierhofer, Angélica Pérez Fornos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

David LanthalerDepartment of Mechatronics, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Andreas GriessnerDepartment of Mechatronics, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Viktor SteixnerDepartment of Mechatronics, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Julie CorreDivision of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Maurizio RanieriDivision of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Samuel CavuscensDivision of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Gautier GrouvelDivision of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Nils GuinandDivision of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Clemens M ZierhoferDepartment of Mechatronics, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Angélica Pérez FornosDivision of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The vestibular system is crucial for balance, spatial orientation, and gaze stabilization. Bilateral vestibulopathy (BV) severely impairs these functions, often co-occurring with severe to profound hearing loss. Combined cochleo-vestibular implants have the potential to rehabilitate these dual sensory impairments. These investigational devices have been used by a small group of subjects with both severe hearing loss and bilateral vestibular loss. When electrically stimulating both the cochlea and the vestibular system, understanding electrical interactions is essential for the successful fitting and operation of these combined implants. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of vestibular pulses on cochlear and vestibular perception, and vice versa. Methods: In our study, we conducted experiments on three recipients of cochleo-vestibular implants, measuring auditory and vestibular perceptual thresholds under controlled conditions. The study examined three interaction paradigms: vestibulo-cochlear, cochleo-vestibular, and vestibulo-vestibular interactions. A staircase procedure was used to determine perceptual thresholds to evaluate the impact of concurrent stimulation on each sensory system. Results: The results showed subject-specific interactions, with significant threshold shifts observed in some cases due to the concurrent stimulation of cochlear and vestibular electrodes. Vestibulo-vestibular interactions consistently led to increased thresholds, indicating electrical interference within the vestibular system. In contrast, vestibulo-cochlear and cochleo-vestibular interactions demonstrated more variable effects, with threshold shifts observed in two of the three subjects. Discussion: These findings suggest that the dual stimulation of the cochlear and vestibular systems must be carefully managed to avoid compromising auditory or vestibular performance. In future research, focusing on larger cohorts could help to better understand the variability in subject responses. In addition, exploring functional effects of these interactions on subjects' performances during normal implant use would complement the threshold measurements of the current study.

Indexed as

balance restorationbilateral vestibulopathycochlear implantelectrical stimulationvestibular implant

Identifiers

PMID40463591
PMCPMC12130027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.