Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40463569›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

AI-Enabled Diagnostic Prediction within Electronic Health Records to Enhance Biosurveillance and Early Outbreak Detection.

Andre R Goncalves, Jose Cadena Pico, Yeping Hu, David Schlessinger, John Greene, Liam O'suilleabhain, Heather Clancy, Michael Vollmer, Vincent Liu, Tom Bates and 1 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Andre R GoncalvesComputational Engineering Division, Engineering Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.ORCID 0000-0002-0320-280X
Jose Cadena PicoComputational Engineering Division, Engineering Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Yeping HuComputational Engineering Division, Engineering Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
David SchlessingerDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California.
John GreeneDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California.
Liam O'suilleabhainDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California.
Heather ClancyDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California.
Michael VollmerDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California.
Vincent LiuDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California.
Tom BatesComputational Engineering Division, Engineering Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Priyadip RayComputational Engineering Division, Engineering Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

Funding

Identifying pre-sepsis opportunities for early, targeted intervention - Equipment SupplementR35GM128672 · NIGMS · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Vincent Liu · 2018 to 2026
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detecting infectious disease outbreaks promptly is crucial for effective public health responses, minimizing transmission, and enabling critical interventions. This study introduces a method that integrates machine learning (ML)-based diagnostic predictions with traditional epidemiological surveillance to enhance biosurveillance systems. Using 4.5 million patient records from 2010 to 2022, ML models were trained to predict, within 24-hour intervals, the likelihood of patients being diagnosed with infectious or unspecified gastrointestinal, respiratory, or neurological diseases. High-confidence predictions were combined with final diagnoses and analyzed using spatiotemporal outbreak detection techniques. Among diseases with five or more outbreaks between 2014 and 2022, 33.3% (41 of 123 outbreaks) were detected earlier, with lead times ranging from 1 to 24 days and an average of 1.33 false positive outbreaks detected annually. This approach demonstrates the potential of integrating ML with conventional methods for faster outbreak detection, provided adequate disease-specific training data is available.

Identifiers

PMID40463569
PMCPMC12132134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.