Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40463485›Full record

ArticleOpen medicine (Warsaw, Poland)2025

Efficacy of a novel drainage catheter in the treatment of CSF leak after posterior spine surgery: A retrospective cohort study.

Shu Yang, Zhengyuan Zhu, Gang Chen, Zhisheng Long

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shu YangDepartment of Orthopedics, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China.
Zhengyuan ZhuDepartment of Orthopedics, DeXing People's Hospital, DeXing, Jiangxi, 334200, China.
Gang ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China.
Zhisheng LongDepartment of Orthopedics, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This work aimed to evaluate and analyze the efficacy and safety of modified drainage and catheterization in the treatment of cerebrospinal fluid leakage (CSFL) after posterior spinal surgery. Methods: A total of 12 patients with CSFL were selected from June 2020 to June 2023. The modified drainage technique was used to treat CSFL. The perioperative index, including the duration of drainage tube placement, was observed. The study also assessed the amount of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage, the healing time of the drainage wound, the occurrence of other complications, the effectiveness of the drainage procedure, and the length of hospital stay. Results: Among the patients with CSFL, the mean drainage time was 6.2 ± 0.8 days, the healing time of the drainage wound was 9.6 ± 1.7 days, and the hospital stay was 7.5 ± 1.0 days. The total volume of CSF drainage was 488.6 ± 55.3 mL. Furthermore, no cases of retrograde infection, drainage orifice exudate, or drainage wound nonunion were reported in this study. Conclusion: This preliminary study demonstrates that the modified catheterization technique is effective in reducing the duration of CSFL and promoting rapid wound healing. Additionally, the novel drainage catheter shows advantages in terms of reducing the incidence of infection and other related complications.

Indexed as

cerebrospinal fluid drainagecerebrospinal fluid leakposterior spinal surgerysurgical complications

Identifiers

PMID40463485
PMCPMC12130775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.