ArticleOpen medicine (Warsaw, Poland)2025
Efficacy of a novel drainage catheter in the treatment of CSF leak after posterior spine surgery: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This work aimed to evaluate and analyze the efficacy and safety of modified drainage and catheterization in the treatment of cerebrospinal fluid leakage (CSFL) after posterior spinal surgery. Methods: A total of 12 patients with CSFL were selected from June 2020 to June 2023. The modified drainage technique was used to treat CSFL. The perioperative index, including the duration of drainage tube placement, was observed. The study also assessed the amount of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage, the healing time of the drainage wound, the occurrence of other complications, the effectiveness of the drainage procedure, and the length of hospital stay. Results: Among the patients with CSFL, the mean drainage time was 6.2 ± 0.8 days, the healing time of the drainage wound was 9.6 ± 1.7 days, and the hospital stay was 7.5 ± 1.0 days. The total volume of CSF drainage was 488.6 ± 55.3 mL. Furthermore, no cases of retrograde infection, drainage orifice exudate, or drainage wound nonunion were reported in this study. Conclusion: This preliminary study demonstrates that the modified catheterization technique is effective in reducing the duration of CSFL and promoting rapid wound healing. Additionally, the novel drainage catheter shows advantages in terms of reducing the incidence of infection and other related complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.