Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40463460›Full record

ReviewActa clinica Croatica2023

CENTRAL SENSITIZATION IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN.

Snežana Tomašević-Todorović, Tijana Spasojević

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta clinica Croatica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Snežana Tomašević-TodorovićUniversity of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine Novi Sad, Medical Rehabilitation Clinic, University Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Tijana SpasojevićUniversity of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine Novi Sad, Medical Rehabilitation Clinic, University Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central sensitization is the mechanism of nociplastic pain and leads to an overemphasized response to a painful stimulus (hyperalgesia) or pain to stimuli that do not otherwise cause pain (allodynia). Persistent nociceptive pain is a risk factor for nociplastic pain, which can often occur in isolation or combination with other types of pain, most often in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain (osteoarthritis, lumbar and cervical syndrome, fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, complex regional pain syndrome, tendinopathy, etc.). Diagnosis of central sensitization is established through clinical examination, questionnaires and quantitative sensory testing (QST), which serves to assess and quantify sensory functions, i.e., determine the threshold for detection of sensory stimuli (heat-cold, pressure, vibration). Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) testing is important for clarifying pain modulation profiles, which can be pro-nociceptive (less effective CPM facilitation) and anti-nociceptive (effective, inhibitory CPM effect). In the pronociceptive modulation profile that is common in patients with musculoskeletal disorders, there is a higher risk of developing chronic pain, a higher prevalence of pain conditions and higher pain associated with injury. CPM testing is also important in the individualization of drug therapy for pain, based on predicting the effectiveness of drugs in the treatment.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System SensitizationChronic PainMusculoskeletal PainHumansPain Measurementcentral sensitizationconditional pain modulationmusculoskeletal pain

Identifiers

PMID40463460
PMCPMC12128804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.