ReviewActa clinica Croatica2023
PERSONALISED PAIN TREATMENT IN INTENSIVE CARE UNITS - MONITORING OF NOCICEPTION.
Review in Acta clinica Croatica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The personalization of pain treatment in intensive care units was developed due to the interindividual variability and heterogeneity of critically ill patients. A personalized approach to pain is based on the prediction and continuous assessment of pain. In critically ill patients, this approach includes the knowledge of the underlying cause of pain related to the primary diagnosis, the causes of procedural pain and previous chronic pain conditions of the patient, in order to apply a specific therapeutic approach. Available treatment recommendations emphasize the use of adaptive or dynamic analgesia, with titration of analgesics according to changes in the clinical state of patients. They indicate the necessity of pain assessment with tools for pain intensity assessment and therapy evaluation, as well as the need for assessment at regular time intervals. Despite treatment guidelines, clinical practice shows significant deviations from evidence-based recommendations. The reasons are primarily the non-recognition of pain, insufficient knowledge of analgesics (type and dose), lack of regular assessment and inadequacy of the applied tools for pain assessment. In terms of personalization, there is a need to develop objective pain assessment methods, such as sensitive and pain-specific tools that do not rely on the patient's ability to communicate and are independent of assessors, disease characteristics and pharmacological interventions in critically ill patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.