ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2025
Neonatal Circumcision Simulation: A Resource for Beginners.
Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Neonatal circumcision is one of the most common procedures performed on males in the United States. Though not a required procedure to learn during residency, an interest in learning this skill exists. Simulation provides an opportunity to be exposed to, and gradually master, procedural skills. We report our experience developing a circumcision simulation session, among a large pediatric intern class. Methods: Participants received an instructional video for asynchronous viewing in advance of an in-person small-group session. Stations for six participants and two facilitators were equipped with Gomco clamp kits and a 15-step checklist. Facilitators demonstrated the neonatal circumcision procedure as participants followed along step-by-step. Bidirectional, real-time feedback was provided. Upon completion, an optional survey allowed participants to anonymously evaluate the course. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. Results: Fifty-three interns participated, with a 72% survey completion rate. The simulation session received an overall average rating of 4.9 (based on 5-point Likert scale; 1 = Discussion: The 30-minute neonatal circumcision simulation session was well-received, exposed learners to a desirable procedure, allowed identification of targeted areas for improvement, and increased confidence. Strengths of our session include novel application of a 3D-printed model and a flexible framework that can be adapted to suit a variety of settings, learners, and available resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.