ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2025
Deep learning model for detecting high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Early detection and removal of suspicious polyps during routine colonoscopies play an important role in reducing the risk of colorectal cancer. Patient management and follow-up are determined by the type of polyps removed and the degree of dysplasia present on histological evaluation. Whereas discerning between a benign polyp and a dysplastic one is a trivial task, distinguishing between tubular adenomas with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) is a challenging task. In this study, we trained a deep learning model to distinguish between colorectal adenomas with LGD and HGD. Design: We retrieved 259 slides of adenomatous polyps taken between January 2011 and October 2024. Slides with HGD were reviewed by a subspecialty-trained GI pathologist. After excluding discordant and duplicate cases, 200 slides remained: 71 (35.5%) with HGD and 129 (64.5%) with LGD. The slides were divided into training (160 slides, 80%) and test (40 slides, 20%) sets. After patch generation and stain normalization, a ResNet34 model (pre-trained on ImageNet) was trained using 5-fold cross-validation. Slide classification was determined by aggregating patch-level predictions. Results: The model's slide-level prediction accuracy was 95.0%, correctly classifying all but 2 out of 40 slides. The model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve score of 0.981 and an F1 score of 0.923. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that deep learning models can accurately distinguish between colonic adenomas with LGD and HGD. Training on a larger dataset could increase the accuracy and generalizability of the model and should be a focus of further studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.