Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40463412›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2025

Deep learning model for detecting high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas.

Eric Steimetz, Zeliha Celen Simsek, Asmita Saha, Rong Xia, Raavi Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eric SteimetzDepartment of Pathology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Zeliha Celen SimsekDepartment of Pathology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Asmita SahaDepartment of Pathology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Rong XiaDepartment of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Raavi GuptaDepartment of Pathology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Early detection and removal of suspicious polyps during routine colonoscopies play an important role in reducing the risk of colorectal cancer. Patient management and follow-up are determined by the type of polyps removed and the degree of dysplasia present on histological evaluation. Whereas discerning between a benign polyp and a dysplastic one is a trivial task, distinguishing between tubular adenomas with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) is a challenging task. In this study, we trained a deep learning model to distinguish between colorectal adenomas with LGD and HGD. Design: We retrieved 259 slides of adenomatous polyps taken between January 2011 and October 2024. Slides with HGD were reviewed by a subspecialty-trained GI pathologist. After excluding discordant and duplicate cases, 200 slides remained: 71 (35.5%) with HGD and 129 (64.5%) with LGD. The slides were divided into training (160 slides, 80%) and test (40 slides, 20%) sets. After patch generation and stain normalization, a ResNet34 model (pre-trained on ImageNet) was trained using 5-fold cross-validation. Slide classification was determined by aggregating patch-level predictions. Results: The model's slide-level prediction accuracy was 95.0%, correctly classifying all but 2 out of 40 slides. The model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve score of 0.981 and an F1 score of 0.923. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that deep learning models can accurately distinguish between colonic adenomas with LGD and HGD. Training on a larger dataset could increase the accuracy and generalizability of the model and should be a focus of further studies.

Indexed as

Deep learningGI polypsHigh-grade dysplasiaTubular adenomaWhole-slide images

Identifiers

PMID40463412
PMCPMC12130978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.