ArticleBioinformatics advances2025
Quantifying the nuclear localization of fluorescently tagged proteins.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Cells are dynamic, continually responding to intra- and extracellular signals. Measuring the response to these signals in individual cells is challenging. Signal transduction is fast, but reporters for downstream gene expression are slow: fluorescent proteins must be expressed and mature. An alternative is to fluorescently tag and monitor the intracellular locations of transcription factors and other effectors. These proteins enter or exit the nucleus in minutes, after upstream signalling modifies their phosphorylation state. Although such approaches are increasingly popular, there is no consensus on how to quantify nuclear localization. Results: Using budding yeast, we developed a convolutional neural network that determines nuclear localization from fluorescence and, optionally, bright-field images. Focusing on changing extracellular glucose, we generated ground-truth data using strains with a transcription factor and a nuclear protein tagged with fluorescent markers. We showed that the neural network-based approach outperformed seven published methods, particularly when predicting single-cell time series, which are key to determining how cells respond. Collectively, our results are conclusive-using machine learning to automatically determine the appropriate image processing consistently outperforms ad hoc approaches. Adopting such methods promises to both improve the accuracy and, with transfer learning, the consistency of single-cell analyses. Availability and implementation: We performed our analysis in Python; code is available at https://git.ecdf.ed.ac.uk/v1jhurba/neunet-nucloc.git.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.