Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40463385›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025

Fc-effector functional antibody assays for SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern.

Xuemin Chen, Grace Li, Caroline Ciric, Theda Gibson, Larry J Anderson, Christina A Rostad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xuemin ChenDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Grace LiDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Caroline CiricDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Theda GibsonDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Larry J AndersonDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Christina A RostadDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Fc regions of antibodies mediate important effector cell functions such as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP), antibody-dependent neutrophil phagocytosis (ADNP), and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). These functions enhance immune defense and infected cell clearance. This study evaluated the effect COVID-19 XBB.1.5 booster vaccination on Fc-effector antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2. Methods: We developed four assays to evaluate the Fc-effector functions of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. ADCC and CDC assays utilized stably transfected luciferase-based target cell lines expressing SARS-CoV-2 spike variants (Ancestral, Wu-1 Omicron XBB.1.5, and EG.5) to measure antibody-mediated lysis by effector cells. ADCP and ADNP were assessed by flow cytometry to measure phagocytosis of fluorescently labeled virus-like particles that display SARS-CoV-2 variant spike proteins. Serum samples from 20 healthy adult volunteers pre- and post-monovalent XBB.1.5 COVID-19 vaccine were analyzed for pseudovirus neutralizing and Fc-effector antibodies. Results: Prior to administration of the COVID-19 XBB.1.5 booster vaccination, cross-neutralizing antibodies against XBB.1.5 and EG.5 variants were minimally detectable, while cross-functional Fc-effector antibodies were present at higher baseline levels. The COVID-19 XBB.1.5 booster vaccination significantly boosted both neutralizing and Fc-effector antibodies in magnitude and breadth. The greatest increase in neutralizing antibodies was against the XBB.1.5 strain, while Fc-effector functional antibodies had similar fold-increases in antibody titers against the breadth of SARS-CoV-2 variants tested. Neutralizing and Fc-effector antibodies were most highly correlated at baseline (prior to booster vaccination) but were less correlated post-vaccination, consistent with differential boosting of neutralizing vs Fc-effector antibodies by the monovalent vaccine. Conclusion: The COVID-19 XBB.1.5 booster vaccination significantly improved the magnitude, breadth, and quality of antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2. Combining Fc-mediated functional and neutralizing antibody assays provides a more comprehensive model for understanding vaccine-induced immunity and optimizing vaccination strategies.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin Fc FragmentsSARS-CoV-2AdultAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibody-Dependent Cell CytotoxicityFemaleHumansImmunization, SecondaryMalePhagocytosisSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin Fc FragmentsSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2ADCCADCPADNPcomplement depositioncytotoxicitynon-neutralizing antibodiesphagocytosis

Identifiers

PMID40463385
PMCPMC12130042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.