ArticleJournal of human kinetics2025
What Variables Differentiate between Selected and Not Selected High-Performance Adolescent Track and Field Athletes?
Article in Journal of human kinetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Countermovement Jump Analysis as a Predictor of Overhead Pitching Velocity in Adolescent Baseball Pitchers.Journal of human kinetics · 2026Article
- A National Study of Somatotypes in Mexican Athletes Across 43 Sports.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early detection of young talent and athlete development programs lack reliable and valid indicators that can predict future success. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to analyse the differences between selected and unselected athletes to define the determinant factors, as well as the influence of gender on the variables that could predict athletic success. The research was carried out using a cross-correlational descriptive design involving 95 athletes, of whom 46 were males (average age = 18.31 ± 2.31 years) and 49 were females (averaged age = 17.27 ± 1.44 years), and whose sociodemographic, psychological, physical and anthropometric variables were analysed. Significant differences were observed in maturity (p < 0.001), anthropometric variables related to bone structure, muscle mass, and body mass (p < 0.001 to 0.044), physical condition variations related to strength, power, sprint ability, flexibility, and balance (p < 0.001 to 0.013), as well as athletic experience and training variants (p = 0.003-0.004). These results should be taken into account for the sporting programming of young athletes and in order to be aware of the modulating effect of biological maturity and its influence on athletic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.