Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40463292›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Processing L2 action verbs shares the same mechanisms for processing L1 items: evidence from a combined behavioral and MEG study.

Elisa Visani, Davide Rossi Sebastiano, Gioacchino Garofalo, Dunja Duran, Melania Tangorra, Marco Mezzadri, Giovanni Buccino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elisa VisaniFondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
Davide Rossi SebastianoFondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
Gioacchino GarofaloUniversità "Vita-Salute" San Raffaele di Milano - Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Milan, Italy.
Dunja DuranFondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
Melania TangorraUniversità di Parma - Dipartimento di Discipline Umanistiche, Sociali e delle Imprese Culturali, Parma, Italy.
Marco MezzadriUniversità di Parma - Dipartimento di Discipline Umanistiche, Sociali e delle Imprese Culturali, Parma, Italy.
Giovanni BuccinoUniversità "Vita-Salute" San Raffaele di Milano - Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Experimental evidence shows that the sensorimotor system is not only involved in performing actions but also in observing and understanding them, even when verbally described. The involvement of the sensorimotor system in processing action related language material is known as embodiment. Following this approach, language items presented in L1 and L2 should affect motor activity in the same manner. Methods: This study aimed to investigate the involvement of motor system during the processing of L2 items in a combined behavioral and MEG study. Healthy Italian native speakers performed a semantic decision task on hand and foot actions presented by means of pictures or verbs expressed in English as L2. Results: Results showed slower hand reaction times and weaker suppression of Beta band power during the processing of hand-related pictures and verbs, as compared to foot-related pictures and verbs, thus suggesting shared neural mechanisms for semantic processing of visually and verbally presented items. Discussion: This in line with a similar study where Italian verbs were used as language items. However, while no dissimilarity was found in the modulation of the motor system during the processing of verbs presented in L1 and pictures depicting actions in the same category, here, when processing L2 verbs, reaction times were slower than when processing visually presented actions, thus implying an additional cost for processing L2 as compared to L1 verbal items. Conclusion: We argue that these findings support embodiment, in that they can be explained by a similar, although stronger involvement of the sensorimotor system during the processing of L2 verbal items.

Indexed as

embodided cognitionembodimentmagnetoencephalographymotor systemsecond language

Identifiers

PMID40463292
PMCPMC12129906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.