ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
A Novel Framework for Quantitative Analysis of Neuronal Primary Cilia in Brain Tissue.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Accurate analysis of neuronal primary cilia is essential for understanding developmental processing of neurons. But existing image segmentation methods struggle with staining variability and background noise. To address this, we developed a more robust segmentation and statistical analysis pipeline using an animal model small sample size and with known neuronal microstructure alterations. Methods: Maternal obesity was induced in mice via a high-fat/high-sucrose diet. Hippocampal tissue from 6-month-old offspring of obese and control dams was analyzed. We developed a MATLAB-based pipeline to segment neuronal cilia from z-stack images, applying mathematical transformations and using the Weibull distribution and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) to assess group differences. Results: The technique segmented cilia despite artifacts, revealing group-specific patterns. Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences, highlighting the method's robustness over traditional tests, especially with small samples. Conclusion: Our method reliably segments neuronal primary cilia in immune-stained sections with thionin-counter staining and offers a sensitive, assumption-free alternative to traditional statistical tests, ideal for small-sample neurobiological studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.