ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Unexpected variability in laboratory and clinical assays used to quantify
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The measurement of cryptococcal capsular polysaccharide (PS) amount and concentration is essential for laboratory studies of its structure and function. Clinically, the detection of cryptococcal capsular polysaccharide as cryptococcal antigen is a foundational assay for the diagnosis of cryptococcosis. In this study we compared the results of four laboratory assays for measuring cryptococcal polysaccharide (gravimetric determination, phenol-sulfuric acid reactivity, Size Exclusion Chromatography Multi-Angle Light Scattering (SEC-MALS), and ELISA) and two clinical assays (lateral flow assay (LFA) (IMMY) and the cryptococcal latex agglutination assay (CLAA) (Remel)) using four cryptococcal strains that each express single repeating polysaccharide motifs. The results show that the sensitivity of laboratory assays for PS was relatively consistent but manifested significant variation with strain. Phenol-sulfuric acid determination was highly variable unless the PS was pre-digested with HCl, suggesting that differences in the structural complexity of the polysaccharide could affect timing and intensity of the colorimetric reaction. Serological assays were the most sensitive, but these showed the most strain-to-strain variation on the threshold of PS detection consistent with antigenic differences. Differences in the reactivity of LFA and CLAA for cryptococcal PS from different strains imply that comparable cryptococcal antigen titers could reflect different concentrations of PS in bodily fluids. In summary, we find that variation in PS structure amongst strains can affect the sensitivity of the various tests used to measure cryptococcal PS. (Word count: 224).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.