ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Improved Source Localization of Auditory Evoked Fields using Reciprocal BEM-FMM.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The precise localization of auditory evoked fields (AEFs) from magnetoencephalography (MEG) data is very important for the functional understanding of the auditory cortex in medicine and cognitive neuroscience. The numerical solution of the field equations in the human head using the boundary element method (BEM) is a powerful tool for achieving this. We hypothesized that the spatial resolution of the BEM is crucial for the achievable accuracy. However, in classical BEM (as implemented, e.g., in MNE-Python), very high resolutions are impractical due to the associated prohibitive computational effort. In contrast, our recently introduced reciprocal boundary element fast multipole method (reciprocal BEM-FMM) allows for hitherto unprecedented spatial resolution. In this work, we apply our reciprocal BEM-FMM technique for source estimation to localize AEFs, and we compare our results with the source estimates produced using a 3-layer BEM model (standard BEM) via MNE-Python. We first validate our methodology through comparison of source estimates of simulated N1m components of AEFs using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) measure. While we obtain ROC measures of about 80% for the standard BEM, reciprocal BEM-FMM reaches about 90%, a significant statistical improvement. We then apply this methodology to analyze the source estimates of experimental data obtained from a cohort of 7 participants subjected to binaural auditory stimulation. Using a dispersion measurement to quantify the focality of localized sources, we find improvements upwards of 30% using reciprocal BEM-FMM over the standard BEM. Analyses from both simulated and experimental data show localization of AEFs using high-resolution reciprocal BEM-FMM is significantly better in terms of accuracy and focality than those estimates of the low-resolution standard BEM. We therefore recommend using the high-resolution reciprocal BEM-FMM to utilize high spatial anatomical precision for the modeling of neural activity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.