ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Amplification-free Detection of Zoonotic Viruses Using Cas13 and Multiple CRISPR RNAs.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Zoonotic viruses such as hantaviruses and influenza A viruses present a threat to humans and livestock. There is thus a need for methods that are rapid, sensitive, and relatively cheap to detect infections with these pathogens early. Here we use an amplification-free CRISPR-Cas13-based assay, which is simple, cheap and field-deployable, to detect the presence or absence of genomic hantavirus or influenza A virus RNA. In addition, we evaluate whether the use of multiple CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs) can improve the sensitivity of this amplification-free method. We demonstrate that for the hantaviruses Tula Virus (TULV) and Andes Virus (ANDV) a combination of two or three crRNAs provides the best sensitivity for detecting viral RNA, whereas for influenza virus RNA detection, additional crRNAs provide no benefit. We also show that the amplification-free method can be used to detect TULV and ANDV RNA in tissue culture infection samples and influenza A virus RNA in clinical nasopharyngeal swabs. In clinical samples, the Cas13 assay has an 85% agreement with RT-qPCR for identifying a positive sample. Overall, these findings indicate that amplification-free CRISPR-Cas13 detection of viral RNA has potential as a tool for rapidly detecting zoonotic virus infections.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.