ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2025
Should Radiation Dose Be Personalized in Patients With Localized NSCLC and Actionable Genetic Alterations? Insight From a Multicenter Real-World Study.
Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Radiation therapy (RT) is central to the management of unresectable stage I to III NSCLC. However, the impact of actionable genetic driver alterations (AGAs) on locoregional control (LRC) from RT remains uncertain. A retrospective, multicenter real-world study was undertaken to determine if common AGAs impact LRC after RT. Methods: Patients who received curative-intent RT for NSCLC between 2018 and 2020 at four centers in the United Kingdom and had available molecular testing were included. Locoregional control was compared in a 1:2 ratio between a group of patients with an AGA and a control group without AGAs. Locoregional control was assessed with competing risks analysis and overall survival was analyzed by Cox regression, adjusting for established prognostic clinical factors. Results: Data was collected for 185 eligible patients: 50 with an AGA and 135 without. Baseline characteristics, including patient demographics, tumor features, and treatment details were evenly distributed between the two groups. LRC was similar in the AGA and non-AGA groups (39% versus 34%, hazard ratio = 1.13, 95% confidence interval: 0.61-1.984, Conclusion: LRC was comparable in the AGA and non-AGA groups suggesting that there is no role for personalization of RT dose solely due to the detection of an AGA. Nevertheless, survival rates were notably higher among patients with AGAs, likely owing to the availability of efficacious targeted therapies on relapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.