Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40462884›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in network physiology2025

Eigenvector biomarker for prediction of epileptogenic zones and surgical success from interictal data.

Sayantika Roy, Armelle Varillas, Emily A Pereira, Patrick Myers, Golnoosh Kamali, Kristin M Gunnarsdottir, Nathan E Crone, Adam G Rouse, Jennifer J Cheng, Michael J Kinsman and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in network physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Adaptation modulates effective connectivity and network stability.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Sayantika RoyUniversity of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, United States.
Armelle VarillasDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Emily A PereiraDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, United States.
Patrick MyersDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Golnoosh KamaliInstitute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Kristin M GunnarsdottirDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Nathan E CroneDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Adam G RouseDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Jennifer J ChengDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Michael J KinsmanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Patrick LandazuriDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Utku UysalDepartment of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Carol M UlloaDepartment of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Nathaniel CameronDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Sara InatiSurgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Kareem A ZaghloulSurgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Varina L BoerwinkleBarrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Sarah WyckoffBarrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Niravkumar BarotDepartment of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.
Jorge González-MartínezDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Joon Y KangDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Sridevi V SarmaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Funding

EEG Biomarkers Derived from Dynamical Network Models Enable Rapid Paths to Accurate Diagnosis and Effective Treatment of EpilepsyR35NS132228 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Sridevi V. Sarma · 2023 to 2026
$2.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS132228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: More than 50 million people worldwide suffer from epilepsy. Approximately 30% of epileptic patients suffer from medically refractory epilepsy (MRE), which means that over 15 million people must seek extensive treatment. One such treatment involves surgical removal of the epileptogenic zone (EZ) of the brain. However, because there is no clinically validated biomarker of the EZ, surgical success rates vary between 30%-70%. The current standard for EZ localization often requires invasive monitoring of patients for several weeks in the hospital during which intracranial EEG (iEEG) data is captured. This process is time-consuming as the clinical team must wait for seizures and visually interpret the iEEG during these events. Hence, an iEEG biomarker that does not rely on seizure observations is desirable to improve EZ localization and surgical success rates. Recently, the source-sink index (SSI) was proposed as an interictal (between seizure) biomarker of the EZ, which captures regional interactions in the brain and in particular identifies the EZ as regions being inhibited ("sinks") by neighbors ("sources") when patients are not seizing. The SSI only requires 5-min snapshots of interictal iEEG recordings. However, one limitation of the SSI is that it is computed heuristically from the parameters of dynamical network models (DNMs). Methods: In this work, we propose a formal method for detecting sink regions from DNMs, which has a strong foundation in linear systems theory. In particular, the steady-state solution of the DNM highlights the sinks and is characterized by the leading eigenvector of the state-transition matrix of the DNM. To test this, we build patient-specific DNMs from interictal iEEG data collected from 65 patients treated across 6 centers. From each DNM, we compute the average leading eigenvectors and evaluate their potential as a biomarker to accurately predict EZ and surgical success. Results: Our findings show the ability of the leading eigenvector to accurately predict EZ (average accuracy 66.81% ± 0.19%) and surgical success (average accuracy 71.9% ± 0.22%) with data from 65 patients across 6 centers from 5 min of data, which we show is comparable with the current method of localizing the EZ over several weeks. Discussion: This eigenvector biomarker has the potential to assist clinicians in localizing the EZ quickly and thus increase surgical success in patients with MRE, resulting in an improvement in patient care and quality of life.

Indexed as

dynamical network modelsepilepsyepileptogenic zone (EZ)interictalnetwork physiology

Identifiers

PMID40462884
PMCPMC12129916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.