ArticleCureus2025
Educating Medical Students on Deaf-Hearing Interpreter Teams: A Virtual Patient Panel Experience.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Communication and cultural differences render d/Deaf patients vulnerable to poorer health outcomes when compared to their hearing peers. Interventions designed to address these inequities are a growing focus in medical education, with virtual platforms (e.g., Zoom) becoming increasingly popular. This article describes the implementation of a one-hour virtual patient panel with an interactive question-and-answer session between a certified Deaf interpreter (CDI) and second-year pre-clerkship medical students at the authors' institution. Following this discussion, students were encouraged to share one or two key takeaways from the session through a survey link. These results were analyzed using generative artificial intelligence to summarize key themes. There were 41 respondents, with a response rate of 15%. The key themes that emerged are grouped under the following thematic headings: role of interpreters and communication; insights about d/Deaf culture; challenges and experiences; and suggestions for improvement. Students' takeaways emphasized themes of communication, cultural competency, and access to care. Student reflections highlighted the novelty and clinical applicability of lessons learned from the panel for their future practice. Further work in medical education is needed to adequately expose healthcare trainees to Deaf culture, particularly how to work with interpreters and CDIs in the clinical environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.