ArticleRSC advances2025
Interpretable machine learning models for predicting the antitumor effects of metal and metal oxide nanomaterials.
Article in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Toxicodynamics and Human Health Risks of Metal Nanoparticles: A Review of AI/ML-Based Predictive Nanotoxicology.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the toxic behavior of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles (M/MOx NPs) is essential for effective tumor diagnosis and treatment, yet generalizing findings remains challenging due to limited data, sampling variability, unreported complexities, low model accuracy, and a lack of interpretability. To address these issues and minimize extensive experimentation, we combined quantum chemistry calculations with published toxicity data to develop a machine learning model achieving over 90% accuracy in cross-validation. Utilizing 39 descriptors extracted from 152 articles, our dataset comprises 2765 instances covering various nanoparticle types, detection methods, and cell types. We enhanced data representation with the Jaccard similarity coefficient and employed Feature Importance and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) to identify key factors influencing cytotoxicity, such as concentration, exposure time, zeta potential, diameter, COSMO area (CA), coating, testing methods, cell types, metal electronegativity, HOMO energy, and molecular weight. Additionally, we analyzed the interactions among these features and their influence on predictions, synthesized novel metal oxide nanoparticles, and assessed their physicochemical properties and anti-tumor toxicity. Cytotoxicity experiments with newly synthesized nanoparticles further validated the model's accuracy and generalizability, revealing hidden relationships and enabling predictions for previously unseen samples. This approach supports preliminary computer-aided screenings, significantly reducing the need for labor-intensive experimentation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.