Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40462804›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Retrospective Evaluation of the Efficacy of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Preventing Surgical Site Infections in Elliptical Skin Biopsy.

Airin Sato, Yu Matsui, Teruhiko Makino, Tadamichi Shimizu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Airin SatoDepartment of Dermatology, University of Toyama, Toyama, JPN.
Yu MatsuiDepartment of Dermatology, University of Toyama, Toyama, JPN.
Teruhiko MakinoDepartment of Dermatology, University of Toyama, Toyama, JPN.
Tadamichi ShimizuDepartment of Dermatology, University of Toyama, Toyama, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionElliptical skin biopsy is a commonly performed dermatologic procedure that provides sufficient tissue for histopathologic diagnosis and additional testing. However, concerns remain regarding the risk of surgical site infection (SSI), leading to the widespread use of prophylactic antibiotics despite the lack of clear supporting evidence. This study aimed to evaluate whether prophylactic antibiotic administration reduces SSI risk following elliptical biopsy. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective observational study was conducted at the University of Toyama, including 202 patients who underwent elliptical biopsy between October 2022 and July 2024. Among them, 146 (72.3%) received prophylactic antibiotics, while 56 (27.7%) did not. The primary outcome was the incidence of SSI within 30 days post procedure. Multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were applied to adjust for potential confounders.

resultsSSI occurred at similar rates in both groups (prophylactic vs. non-prophylactic: 11.0% vs. 10.7%, p = 1.0), suggesting that antibiotic prophylaxis may not be effective in reducing infection risk. Neither multivariable logistic regression nor IPTW analysis demonstrated a significant association between prophylactic antibiotic use and SSI prevention. Additionally, clinicians with more years of experience were less likely to prescribe prophylactic antibiotics, indicating greater confidence in withholding antibiotics when not clinically necessary. In contrast, higher serum albumin levels were associated with greater antibiotic use. Although this association reached statistical significance, the actual difference in albumin levels (4.1 vs. 3.8 g/dL) is modest and likely lacks clinical relevance. These findings suggest that antibiotic prescribing may have been influenced more by physician discretion, particularly among less experienced clinicians, as well as by institutional practices, routine habits, or excessive concern about SSI risk, rather than by objective indicators of clinical need.

conclusionThese findings suggest that routine prophylactic antibiotic use after elliptical biopsy may not be necessary in dermatologic practice. Given increasing concerns about antimicrobial resistance and antibiotic shortages, optimizing antibiotic use is a critical consideration. Emphasizing alternative strategies, such as meticulous wound irrigation, postoperative care, and patient education, may help minimize SSI risk while ensuring safe wound healing. Further prospective studies with larger cohorts and standardized treatment protocols are warranted to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

elliptical skin biopsyexcisional biopsyfusiform biopsypostoperative prophylactic antibioticretrospective studysurgical site infections (ssi)

Identifiers

PMID40462804
PMCPMC12131625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.