ReviewCureus2025
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Related to Artificial Intelligence Among Medical Students and Academics in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- AI applied to Saudi Arabia higher education: systematic literature review-SLR with PRISMA and VOSviewer.Frontiers in big data · 2026Pooled it
- Faculty Perspectives on AI Integration in Anatomy Education in the United Arab Emirates: Cross-Sectional Survey.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in medical education: Saudi Arabian perspective.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- The current status, knowledge, attitudes, and challenges of generative artificial intelligence use among undergraduate nursing students: a single-center cross-sectional survey of western China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Medical Students' Readiness for Medical Artificial Intelligence (AI).Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review aims to analyze the existing literature on artificial intelligence (AI) applications in medical education in Saudi Arabia, and it spanned the period from January 2020 to February 2025. The review focuses on the nature and scope of AI applications, evidence synthesis types, geographical distribution of authorship, quality of research, challenges encountered, and research gaps within Saudi Arabia. Studies were retrieved from the PubMed, Google Scholar, ProQuest, and Web of Science databases. The process followed the guidelines outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). We included studies that explored knowledge, attitudes, and practices of AI among medical students and academics in Saudi Arabia. We first screened the titles and abstracts of the studies according to our inclusion criteria, and then reviewed the full texts of those that met the criteria. A standardized form was used to collect data, including author information, study population, research objectives, and key findings. The review identified key areas of focus, including personalized learning, interactive simulations, and real-time feedback in medical education. Most studies discussed the potential benefits of AI tools in improving student engagement and clinical decision-making skills. However, significant challenges were reported, such as insufficiencies in faculty training, data privacy concerns, and disparities in technological infrastructure. While the use of AI in medical education in Saudi Arabia has great potential, there are still significant challenges. There is a need for proper training for faculty and standardized AI curricula. More research is required to assess the long-term effects of AI on educational outcomes and find ways to overcome the current barriers to its successful implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.