Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40462769›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology report2025

Clinical-radiomics models with machine-learning algorithms to distinguish uncomplicated from complicated acute appendicitis in adults: a multiphase multicenter cohort study.

Li Li, Yangyang Sun, Yang Sun, Yunhe Gao, Benlong Zhang, Ruizhao Qi, Fugeng Sheng, Xiaodong Yang, Xu Liu, Lin Liu and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology report, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Li LiChinese PLA Medical School, Beijing, P. R. China.
Yangyang SunSuzhou Yuanqiyun Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd, Suzhou, Jiangsu, P. R. China.
Yang SunDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China.
Yunhe GaoChinese PLA Medical School, Beijing, P. R. China.
Benlong ZhangChinese PLA Medical School, Beijing, P. R. China.
Ruizhao QiDepartment of General Surgery, The Fifth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China.
Fugeng ShengDepartment of Radiology, The Fifth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China.
Xiaodong YangDepartment of General Surgery, The Sixth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China.
Xu LiuDepartment of General Surgery, General Hospital of Southern Theatre Command of PLA, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Lin LiuDepartment of General Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China.
Canrong LuDepartment of General Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China.
Lin ChenDepartment of General Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7905-2505
Kecheng ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing evidence suggests that non-operative management (NOM) with antibiotics could serve as a safe alternative to surgery for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis (AA). However, accurately differentiating between uncomplicated and complicated AA remains challenging. Our aim was to develop and validate machine-learning-based diagnostic models to differentiate uncomplicated from complicated AA. This was a multicenter cohort trial conducted from January 2021 and December 2022 across five tertiary hospitals. Three distinct diagnostic models were created, namely, the clinical-parameter-based model, the CT-radiomics-based model, and the clinical-radiomics-fused model. These models were developed using a comprehensive set of eight machine-learning algorithms, which included logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), gradient boosting (GB), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), Gaussian Naïve Bayes (GNB), and multi-layer perceptron (MLP). The performance and accuracy of these diverse models were compared. All models exhibited excellent diagnostic performance in the training cohort, achieving a maximal AUC of 1.00. For the clinical-parameter model, the GB classifier yielded the optimal AUC of 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-0.90) in the testing cohort, while the LR classifier yielded the optimal AUC of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.66-0.86) in the validation cohort. For the CT-radiomics-based model, GB classifier achieved the best AUC of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.60-0.88) in the testing cohort, and SVM yielded an optimal AUC of 0.63 (95% CI: 0.51-0.75) in the validation cohort. For the clinical-radiomics-fused model, RF classifier yielded an optimal AUC of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.74-0.95) in the testing cohort and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.67-0.86) in the validation cohort. An open-access, user-friendly online tool was developed for clinical application. This multicenter study suggests that the clinical-radiomics-fused model, constructed using RF algorithm, effectively differentiated between complicated and uncomplicated AA.

Indexed as

appendectomycomplicated acute appendicitismachine-learning algorithmuncomplicated acute appendicitis

Identifiers

PMID40462769
PMCPMC12133283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.