Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40462701›Full record

ArticleOral health & preventive dentistry2025

Oral Health Conditions of Preschool Children Among Birth Cohort Studies: A Scoping Review.

Pierre-Jean Berat, Vincent de Andrade, Nolwenn Regnault, Annabelle Tenenbaum, Sylvie Azogui-Levy

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Oral health & preventive dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pierre-Jean Berat
Vincent de Andrade
Nolwenn Regnault
Annabelle Tenenbaum
Sylvie Azogui-Levy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOral health is an integral part of health and well-being. Through birth cohorts, it is possible to identify health conditions and pathways of exposure that occur earlier in life. The objective of this study was to identify the data collected by birth cohorts regarding the oral health of children aged 0 to 5 years and to determine the relationship between their dental health status and their environment. MATERIALS AND

methodsFive databases were queried: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Dentistry & Oral Sciences Source. Eligible articles presented data on children's oral health before their 6th birthday, based on birth cohorts. They could be based on clinical, epidemiological, or self-reported oral health data obtained during at least one follow-up between birth and the age of 6 years.

results3083 articles were identified in biomedical literature databases. After exclusions for various reasons, 359 abstracts and finally 145 full-length articles were read. A total of 101 articles were included in the analysis. These 101 articles came from 43 cohorts on 5 continents. They were published between October 1980 and January 2022. The most frequently identified theme was early childhood caries and its associated factors. Other themes were also studied: quality of life in relation to oral health, children's use of dental care, eruption of primary teeth, enamel anomalies, dental trauma, occlusion, and parafunctions in childhood.

conclusionPreschool children's oral health has been widely studied in terms of caries and its risk factors. However, biopsychosocial determinants have to date been insufficiently studied in these birth cohorts.

Indexed as

Oral HealthBirth CohortChild, PreschoolDental CariesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornQuality of Lifebirth cohortoral healthpreschool childrenscoping review

Identifiers

PMID40462701
PMCPMC12135870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.