Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40462682›Full record

ArticleAnatomy & cell biology2025

Anatomical variations of the hepatic veins: an observational study from a single cadaveric lab in South India.

Rajaneesh Shivamurthy Tolahunase, Pauline Shanthi, Suganthy Rabi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomy & cell biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rajaneesh Shivamurthy TolahunaseDepartment of Anatomy, Christian Medical College Vellore, The Tamil Nadu Dr. MGR Medical University, Chennai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3464-3063
Pauline ShanthiDepartment of Anatomy, Christian Medical College Vellore, The Tamil Nadu Dr. MGR Medical University, Chennai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4809-2974
Suganthy RabiDepartment of Anatomy, Christian Medical College Vellore, The Tamil Nadu Dr. MGR Medical University, Chennai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6886-1515

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern hepatic resections need to consider hepatic vein variations to reduce surgical complications. In this study we determined the variation in the branching pattern of hepatic veins by modified luminal casting technique and evaluated the association of the hepatic vein variations with morphological variations of the liver. The morphological features of thirty formalin-fixed livers were noted. The branching pattern of the hepatic veins was studied by retrograde injection of silicone into the hepatic veins through the inferior vena cava. According to the descriptions given by previous studies, the right, middle, left hepatic veins, and combined middle and left hepatic venous branching patterns were categorized. The data was analyzed statistically. The predominant hepatic vein patterns were De Cecchis type I right hepatic vein (30%), Neumann type I middle hepatic vein (67%), and Reichert type I left hepatic vein (70%). A common trunk for the middle and left hepatic vein was present in 60% and Wind's type II was more common (30%) followed by type I (20%) and type III (10%). While there was no association between the De Cecchis and Wind types, 90% of the conical-shaped livers exhibited type II middle/left hepatic vein pattern of Wind's classification. The present study also observed a rare variation of an accessory inferior left hepatic vein.

Indexed as

HepatectomyHepatic veinsLiver transplantationSiliconVena cava inferior

Identifiers

PMID40462682
PMCPMC12519003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.