Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40462599›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental science2025

The Home Literacy Environment and Reading Development of Children With and Without Learning Disabilities.

Rachelle M Johnson, Sara A Hart, Richard K Wagner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachelle M JohnsonDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8416-9262
Sara A HartDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9793-0420
Richard K WagnerDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3243-7894

Funding

THE FLORIDA LONGITUDINAL STUDYP50HD052120 · NICHD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CHRIS W SCHATSCHNEIDER · 2006 to 2026
$31.7M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD052120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Home literacy environment (HLE) refers to children's exposure to and engagement in reading-related activities in the home. Although HLE is known to be related to successful early reading achievement in general, less is known about this relation for students with learning disabilities (LDs). We investigated the relation between HLE and reading achievement using a sample of 2090 children from the ECLS-K:2011 dataset, half of whom were identified as students with LDs and half serving as controls. Latent growth curve modeling was used to examine growth in reading from kindergarten (age 5) through fifth grade (age 10). For both groups, growth was characterized by mastery learning with a negative correlation between intercept (i.e., performance at the first time point) and slope (rate of growth). Compared to controls, LD children had a lower mean intercept but a higher mean slope. HLE was positively related to intercept for both groups. However, the positive relation between HLE and reading did not extend to later grades, with a small but significant negative relation between HLE and slope for both groups that was a byproduct of the negative correlation between intercept and slope. The pattern of results remained the same after controlling for socioeconomic status (SES). It appears HLE is equally important to the reading achievement of both groups.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentHome EnvironmentLearning DisabilitiesLiteracyReadingChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleECLS‐K:2011home literacy environmentlearning disabilitylongitudinalreading achievement

Identifiers

PMID40462599
PMCPMC12573077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.