Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40462577›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2025

Relationships Between Spontaneous Alpha Oscillation and Brain Response Amid the Complexity of Brain Adaptation and Spectral Signal Composition.

Guang Ouyang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Guang OuyangComplex Neural Signals Decoding Lab, Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

Hong Kong Government 17609321University of Hong Kong 2202100568University of Hong Kong 2203100569
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain operates as a complex dynamic system, continuously generating both structured spontaneous activity and stimulus-evoked responses. Because these activities originate from the same neural architecture, they are hypothesized to be interconnected. However, research has yet to establish a definitive relationship between spontaneous and response patterns, as findings have been mixed and inconclusive. We argue that this ambiguity stems from significant theoretical and methodological challenges in characterizing the relevant variables amidst the brain's complexity. In this study, we investigated the cross-individual correlation between spontaneous Alpha amplitude and the magnitude of brain responses to simple stimuli. Our analysis revealed a robust correlation, but only after accounting for two key confounding factors inherent to the brain's complex dynamics: (1) strong adaptation effects across repeated stimulus exposures and (2) the mixture of aperiodic and band-specific dynamic activity signals. These results demonstrate a close association between the strength of Alpha oscillations-a primary brain rhythm implicated in various functions-and the magnitude of stimuli-evoked responses. Specifically, individuals with higher resting-state Alpha amplitudes exhibit stronger brain responses. This discovery not only highlights methodological challenges in relating spontaneous and evoked brain activity, but also demonstrates that they can be addressed. Our findings have significant implications for research aimed at understanding the mechanistic models and functional roles of the brain's dynamic system, shedding light on future investigations into the interplay between intrinsic and evoked neural dynamics.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAlpha RhythmBrainAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40462577
PMCPMC12134718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.