ArticlePsychophysiology2025
Oscillatory and Aperiodic Contributions to EEG Event-Related Time-Frequency Metrics During Cognitive Control and Reinforcement Processing: A Registered Report.
Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brain oscillations, or rhythms, coordinate communication across distributed brain networks. These rhythms provide a foundation for the brain network interactions required for cognition. Oscillations coexist with non-rhythmic background aperiodic activity that forms a characteristic 1/f pattern in power spectra. Aperiodic brain activity is associated with cognition and can confound the detection of oscillations. In this Registered Report, we applied time-resolved spectral parameterization to EEG recordings during two common cognitive tasks. Neural dynamics recorded during many cognitive paradigms show similar patterns, including synchronization of mediofrontal theta (4-8 Hz) and desynchronization of posterior alpha (9-13 Hz) and central beta (15-30 Hz). Our results indicate that common task time-frequency signatures, including mediofrontal theta synchronization and parietal alpha desynchronization, can be attributed primarily to neural oscillatory phenomena. Intriguingly, we uncover evidence of stimulus-locked aperiodic power changes, which are responsive to the need for cognitive control and to reinforcement processing. Furthermore, aperiodic power correlated strongly with non-baseline-corrected total power estimates, and whereas oscillatory power correlated strongly with portions of baseline-corrected power estimates, it failed to correlate with other portions of baseline-corrected power. Finally, after baseline correction, aperiodic correlations with TF power remain high. These results indicate two primary outcomes. First, task TF signatures in theta and alpha bands reflect primarily parameterized oscillations. Second, aperiodic activity is time-dependent during cognitive processing, and these dynamics are not accounted for by baseline correction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.