ArticleKorean journal of orthodontics2025
Article in Korean journal of orthodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this research was to analyze the three-dimensional forces acting on the mandibular teeth with aligner activation for distalization and an antitipping design of the mandibular canines, based on various pretreatment canine tips Methods: Five sets of clear aligners were designed to produce the same 0.25 mm distalization forces, with/without the 2° antitipping design, and were applied to canines with three initial angulations. Each group consisted of 12 aligners. Aligner forces were measured in real time using a force transducer measurement system. Results: In the mesial group, the canines mainly received distal and extrusive forces; labial and intrusive forces were observed on the incisors, and the second premolar received mesial forces. In the upright and distal groups, the canines were subjected to distal and intrusive forces, while the incisors were subjected to lingual and extrusive forces. Greater mesial forces on the second premolars were also observed. In the upright and distal groups, the distal and intrusive forces on the canines, and the lingual and extrusive forces on the incisors, were reduced by adding a 2° antitipping design to the canines; however, the mesial and intrusive forces on the second premolars increased. Conclusions: With clear aligners, the "bowing effect" is aggravated when the initial angulation of the canines is distal. This effect can be partially relieved by implementing an antitipping design on the canines, although greater attention should be paid to posterior anchorage control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.