Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40462500›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2025

Epidemiological impact and cost-effectiveness analysis of PrEP provision expansion among MSM in the Netherlands.

Haoyi Wang, Stephanie Popping, David van de Vijver, Kai J Jonas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Haoyi WangDepartment of Work and Social Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1844-7156
Stephanie PoppingDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
David van de VijverViroscience Department, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5877-8526
Kai J JonasDepartment of Work and Social Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6607-1993

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSeveral European countries show potential for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) provision expansion, with many men who have sex with men (MSM) on waiting lists. In the Netherlands, approximately 15,000 PrEP-eligible/intending MSM are awaiting PrEP access. We modelled the epidemiological and economic impact of extending PrEP provision considering several PrEP provision routes (National PrEP Programme and alternative PrEP providers).

methodsWe calibrated our HIV transmission model among the Dutch MSM epidemic. PrEP was expanded from 2022 onwards, covering an additional 3000 MSM on the waiting list and in addition one-third (5000), two-thirds (10,000), and all (15,000) PrEP-eligible/intending MSM by 2024, compared to a non-expansion scenario. The epidemiological impact was projected by 2030. Costs were calculated from a third-party payer's perspective over 40 years with Dutch-specific quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Additionally, a budget impact analysis was performed over 5 years.

resultsCovering the 3000 waiting-list MSM, one-third, two-thirds and all PrEP eligible/intending MSM by 2024 will avert 17 (5.7%), 46 (15.2%), 88 (29.1%) and 115 (37.9%) cumulative new HIV acquisitions compared to the base-case scenario. Consequently, 4, 2, 0 and 0 new HIV acquisitions will result by 2030, respectively. The epidemiological impact of PrEP expansion is sensitive to the users' PrEP adherence, but overall minimal by PrEP targeting strategies, given the strongly declining epidemic. Increasing the National PrEP Programme's capacity incurred more costs to the payer (short-term budget impact ranging from €2.25 to €45.29 million). PrEP expansion can be cost-saving when all PrEP-eligible/intending MSM are covered and fully provided by alternative PrEP providers, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of -€2160/QALY over 40 years. This scenario dominated over all other scenarios. Our cost-effectiveness analysis is most sensitive to the individual co-payment for PrEP-related testing when accessing PrEP via alternative PrEP providers and on-demand PrEP use.

conclusionsExpanding PrEP coverage is crucial to reduce HIV acquisitions further and reach zero new acquisitions by 2030. As the Dutch National PrEP Programme reached capacity limits, PrEP expansion through alternative routes should be encouraged. Nevertheless, balancing out-of-pocket expenses and reimbursed care is key for healthcare equity.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisDisease Transmission, InfectiousHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MalePre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdultCost-Effectiveness AnalysisHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsQuality-Adjusted Life YearsAnti-HIV Agentsbudget impact analysiscost‐effectiveness analysisEuropeHIVmathematical modellingmen who have sex with menpre‐exposure prophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID40462500
PMCPMC12134395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.