Trial reportJournal of clinical periodontology2025
Clinical Features Associated With Periodontal Case Misclassification by an Active Matrix Metalloproteinase-8 Point-of-Care Oral Rinse Test.
Trial report in Journal of clinical periodontology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Self-detection and Professional Screening Strategies for Early Detection of Periodontitis: Diagnostic Accuracy of Bleeding on Brushing, Salivary Activated Matrix Metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) and CDC/AAP Screening Questionnaire
Diagnostic Accuracy of Self-Reported Parameters, Oral and Systemic Biomarker Profile for the Detection of Periodontal Health and Disease
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Features Associated With Periodontal Case Misclassification by an Active Matrix Metalloproteinase-8 Point-of-Care Oral Rinse Test.Journal of clinical periodontology · 2025Trial
- aMMP-8 self-testing and self-administered questionnaires for periodontitis screening: A diagnostic trial in a Chinese population.Journal of periodontology · 2026Article
- Point-of-Care Biomarker Monitoring of Treatment Efficacy: Changes in Mouthrinse Active Matrix Metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) Concentrations Following Periodontal Anti-Infective Treatment.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- A survey of Australian consumers' and dentists' perceptions of saliva as a biofluid for periodontitis diagnosis.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe diagnostic performance of active matrix metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) point-of-care oral rinse test (POC-ORT) for periodontitis needs to be improved because of its relatively low sensitivity. This study attempted to identify the clinical features associated with the misclassification of periodontal cases by the test.
methodThis work consisted of two cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy studies involving a representative cohort in Hong Kong, China, and a convenience sample of subjects in Shanghai, China. The outcomes of the aMMP-8 POC-ORT (index test) were compared to the case definitions of the 2017 World Workshop on the classification of periodontal health status (reference test). The analysis reports the diagnostic accuracy parameters, the Youden index and correlations between the aMMP-8 test outcomes and clinical features.
resultsIn this study, 384 and 390 subjects were enrolled in Hong Kong and Shanghai, respectively. The conventional 20 ng/mL threshold failed to detect more than 50% of early-stage (I/II) cases. The positive POC-ORT results were significantly correlated with the number of sites with bleeding on probing (BOP), probing pocket depth (PPD) ≥ 4 mm, PPD ≥ 5 mm, PPD ≥ 4 mm and BOP, PPD ≥ 5 mm and BOP and clinical attachment loss. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for a positive test increased with the number of sites with PPD ≥ 5 mm: 1.092 (95% CI: 1.063-1.127, p < 0.001) for the Hong Kong sample and 1.074 (95% CI: 1.050-1.100, p < 0.001) for the Shanghai sample, suggesting a higher likelihood of a positive result with each additional pocket ≥ 5 mm. The same was observed for PPD ≥ 5 mm with BOP: 1.093 (95% CI: 1.064-1.129, p < 0.001) and 1.077 (95% CI: 1.052-1.105, p < 0.001). Notably, the false-negative cases were characterised by a significantly smaller number of periodontal pockets, BOP percentages and bleeding pockets than the true-positive ones.
conclusionsThe false-negative cases, which are responsible for the observed low sensitivity of the POC-ORT, showed more localised periodontal inflammation and pocketing. As the oral rinse test measures the overall level of aMMP-8 cleared by the gingival crevicular fluid from various lesions throughout the whole dentition, localised periodontitis appears more difficult to detect. Additional studies are needed to optimise the sampling strategy and set the cut-off value of a positive test.
trial registrationThe study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster (IRB Approval: UW22-132; trial registration: NCT03928080) and the Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Ethics Committee (IRB Approval: SH9H-2021-T408-3; trial registration: NCT05513599).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.