ArticleTurkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology2025
The role of secretome in restoring ovarian function: A systematic review and meta-analysis of
Article in Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Secretome improves anti-Müllerian hormone level and ovarian function in a premature ovarian insufficiency mice model.Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the efficacy of secretomes in restoring ovarian function in premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) in a mouse model, researchers emphasizing their potential as a novel, cell-free therapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines and included studies from four databases through December 2023. The bias risk was assessed using the tool for animal studies, which is Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation risk-of-bias. Outcomes, including the hormonal levels of estradiol (E2), anti-müllerian hormone (AMH), and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) were analyzed, with statistical comparisons made between the secretome-treated and control groups. Four studies encompassing sixty mice were included. The meta-analysis showed a significant increase in E2 levels in the secretome group [mean difference (MD)=37.45, 95% confidence interval (CI): 5.78 to 69.11; p=0.02]. No significant difference in AMH levels was observed; however, a sensitivity analysis resulted in the difference becoming statistically significant (MD=1.83, 95% CI: 0.95 to 2.71; p<0.0001). Moreover, the analysis revealed a significant reduction in FSH levels in the secretome group (MD=-36.80, 95% CI: -61.91 to -11.69; p=0.004) even after the sensitivity analysis. Our findings demonstrated enhanced outcomes with secretome therapy in the management of POI. Further research, particularly involving human subjects, is necessary to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.