ArticleStatistics in medicine2025
A Seamless Hybrid Phase II/III Design With Bayesian Interim Subgroup Selection.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modeling tumor dynamics and predicting response to therapies in a murine pancreatic cancer model.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Population selection is a crucial subject in clinical development nowadays as personalized medicine is growing in interest. Evolution in biomarker scanning techniques allows for the composition and detection of sub-populations of interest when analyzing new drug responses in a disease. Seamless adaptive trials could allow for subgroup analysis with the selection of the most promising population at interim analysis. We propose a hybrid Bayesian design for seamless Phase II/III trials with binary and time-to-event outcomes for the first and second phases, respectively. In this work, at interim analysis, several prior distributions, including shrinkage prior, are compared to possibly select/discard a population, and a final test using a conditional error function as a combination method testing procedure to control the frequentist type I error is used. Simulation studies showed that the logistic regression model performs better than frequentist testing for the population selection problem when the subgroup should be selected. Shrinkage prior distributions tend to be more conservative than simpler normal distributions as studies that would have ended positively are stopped at interim analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.