Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40462403›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology2025

Artificial intelligence in prenatal diagnosis: Down syndrome risk assessment with the power of gradient boosting-based machine learning algorithms.

Emre Yalçın, Tarık Kaan Koç, Serpil Aslan, Süleyman Cansun Demir, İsmail Cüneyt Evrüke, Mete Sucu, Mesut Avan, Fatma İşlek Uzay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emre YalçınÇukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Perinatology, Adana, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-7088-6749
Tarık Kaan KoçMalatya Turgut Özal University Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Department of Software Engineering, Malatya, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0008-8874-3904
Serpil AslanMalatya Turgut Özal University Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Department of Software Engineering, Malatya, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-8009-063X
Süleyman Cansun DemirÇukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Perinatology, Adana, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-8331-9559
İsmail Cüneyt EvrükeÇukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Perinatology, Adana, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-7348-6457
Mete SucuÇukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Perinatology, Adana, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-6889-7147
Mesut AvanÇukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Perinatology, Adana, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0001-8458-6963
Fatma İşlek UzayÇukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Perinatology, Adana, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-8660-4854

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: One of the most common chromosomal abnormalities seen during pregnancy is Down syndrome (Trisomy 21). To determine the risk of Down syndrome, first-trimester combined screening tests are essential. Using data from the first-trimester screening test, this study compares machine learning and deep learning models to forecast the risk of Down syndrome. Materials and Methods: Within the scope of the study, biochemical and biophysical data of 959 pregnant women who underwent first-trimester screening tests at Çukurova University Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic between 2020-2024 were analyzed. After cleaning missing and erroneous data, various preprocessing and normalization techniques were applied to the final dataset consisting of 853 observations. Down syndrome risk prediction was performed using different machine learning models, and model performances were compared based on accuracy rates and other evaluation metrics. Results: Experimental results show that the CatBoost model provides the highest success rate, with an accuracy rate of 95.31%. In addition, the XGBoost and LightGBM models exhibited high performance, with accuracy rates of 95.19% and 94.84%, respectively. The study also examines the effects of the class imbalance problem on model performance in detail and evaluates various strategies to reduce this imbalance. Conclusion: The findings show that gradient boosting-based machine learning models have significant potential in Down syndrome risk prediction. This approach is expected to contribute to the reduction of unnecessary invasive tests and improve clinical decision-making processes by increasing the accuracy rate in prenatal screening processes. Future studies should aim to increase the generalization capacity of the model on larger data sets and to provide integration with different machine learning algorithms.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclassification algorithmsDown syndromefirst-trimester screening testgradient boostingmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40462403
PMCPMC12136125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.