Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40462390›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2025

Dynamic Prediction of an Event Using Multiple Longitudinal Markers: A Model Averaging Approach.

Reza Hashemi, Taban Baghfalaki, Viviane Philipps, Helene Jacqmin-Gadda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Reza HashemiDepartment of Statistics, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.
Taban BaghfalakiDepartment of Mathematics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2100-4532
Viviane PhilippsInserm, Research Center U1219, Univ. Bordeaux, ISPED, Bordeaux, France.
Helene Jacqmin-GaddaInserm, Research Center U1219, Univ. Bordeaux, ISPED, Bordeaux, France.

Funding

French National Research Agency ANR-21-CE36
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic event prediction, using joint modeling of survival time and longitudinal variables, is extremely useful in personalized medicine. However, the estimation of joint models including many longitudinal markers is still a computational challenge because of the high number of random effects and parameters to be estimated. In this paper, we propose a model averaging strategy to combine predictions from several joint models for the event, including one longitudinal marker only or pairwise longitudinal markers. The prediction is computed as the weighted mean of the predictions from the one-marker or two-marker models, with the time-dependent weights estimated by minimizing the time-dependent Brier score. This method enables us to combine a large number of predictions issued from joint models to achieve a reliable and accurate individual prediction. Advantages and limits of the proposed methods are highlighted in a simulation study by comparison with the predictions from well-specified and misspecified all-marker joint models, as well as the one-marker and two-marker joint models. Using the PBC2 data set, the method is used to predict the risk of death in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. The method is also used to analyze a French cohort study called the 3C data. In our study, seventeen longitudinal markers are considered to predict the risk of death.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalBiomarkersComputer SimulationFranceHumansLiver Cirrhosis, BiliaryLongitudinal StudiesPrecision MedicineSurvival AnalysisBiomarkersBrier scoredynamic predictionjoint modelmodel averagingpersonalized medicine

Identifiers

PMID40462390
PMCPMC12134451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.