ArticleInternational wound journal2025
Machine Learning Insights Into Amputation Risk: Evaluating Wound Classification Systems in Diabetic Foot Ulcers.
Article in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in the application of artificial intelligence-driven multi-modal imaging technologies in the comprehensive diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026Review
- Predicting Diabetic Foot Ulcer Outcomes: Machine Learning-Based Refinement of IWGDF-Approved Classifications for Outpatient Services.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2026Article
- Risk factors for re-amputation and major amputation following diabetic foot amputation: a clinical and socioeconomic perspective.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of major amputation risk after initial limb-preserving surgery in diabetic foot.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study compares the performance of various wound classification systems to determine which system most effectively predicts amputation risk in diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) patients. Additionally, it identifies the key clinical and socioeconomic factors that influence this risk. A total of 616 DFUs from 400 outpatient participants in a prospective cohort study were followed over 6 months. Ten machine learning (ML) algorithms were employed to evaluate the predictive accuracy of various wound classification systems. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used to interpret the predictions of the selected model. The DIAFORA (diabetic foot risk assessment) and WIFI (Wound, Ischaemia and foot Infection) classification systems demonstrated the highest predictive power for predicting amputation within 6 months. SHAP analysis revealed that wound penetration to bone, presence of ischaemia and infection, renal failure, delayed first specialist visit, longer diabetes duration, high baseline HbA1c, low education levels and high body mass index were significant risk factors for amputation. Conversely, higher education levels served as a protective factor. Occupation showed variable effects, with private-sector employment associated with increased risk, while being a housewife was linked to lower risk. Infection and ischaemia are significant factors affecting DFU outcomes. Addressing treatment adherence barriers and implementing tailored interventions that consider patients' occupational needs can reduce amputation rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.