Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40462388›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2025

Machine Learning Insights Into Amputation Risk: Evaluating Wound Classification Systems in Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

Farideh Mostafavi, Mohammad Reza Amini, Yadollah Mehrabi, Ensieh Nasli Esfahani, Seyed Saeed Hashemi Nazari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Farideh MostafaviStudent Research Committee, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1611-3806
Mohammad Reza AminiDiabetes Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5550-6792
Yadollah MehrabiDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ensieh Nasli EsfahaniDiabetes Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Saeed Hashemi NazariDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compares the performance of various wound classification systems to determine which system most effectively predicts amputation risk in diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) patients. Additionally, it identifies the key clinical and socioeconomic factors that influence this risk. A total of 616 DFUs from 400 outpatient participants in a prospective cohort study were followed over 6 months. Ten machine learning (ML) algorithms were employed to evaluate the predictive accuracy of various wound classification systems. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used to interpret the predictions of the selected model. The DIAFORA (diabetic foot risk assessment) and WIFI (Wound, Ischaemia and foot Infection) classification systems demonstrated the highest predictive power for predicting amputation within 6 months. SHAP analysis revealed that wound penetration to bone, presence of ischaemia and infection, renal failure, delayed first specialist visit, longer diabetes duration, high baseline HbA1c, low education levels and high body mass index were significant risk factors for amputation. Conversely, higher education levels served as a protective factor. Occupation showed variable effects, with private-sector employment associated with increased risk, while being a housewife was linked to lower risk. Infection and ischaemia are significant factors affecting DFU outcomes. Addressing treatment adherence barriers and implementing tailored interventions that consider patients' occupational needs can reduce amputation rates.

Indexed as

Amputation, SurgicalDiabetic FootMachine LearningAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk Factorsamputationdiabetic footmachine learningulcer

Identifiers

PMID40462388
PMCPMC12134084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.